Source code is just more readable by humans, that's all. Why are you so mad at the person who has your executable but wants to revert it to code? Do you not realize that you are providing him with instructions at some level, that were transformed into more machine-oriented instructions at a lower level? You are giving him code, no matter what type. If any of you have been following the software industry since the 70's, these discussions have been exhausted again and again. Since when is closed source a viable option for security? I understand that most of you come from outside the computing industry/sciences, and that this being a commercial business type of dicussion, many people are going to be a little sensitive about their "copyrights" (the most misunderstood term in history, probably) but like smjones said, this is hopeless. So if I can do it, those with real skill it would be no problem.īottom line, I won't be posting any thing I would want to keep control over.Įdit : No I will not violate Copyrights and show how or do it for others. The thing is, I am at best only an average programmer. The point being, is that Your EX4s are not safe at all. I was able to reconstruct the EX4 back into a MQ4 with the same functionality, only the variable names had to be recreated, because they are stored dynamically at mem locations. Well without giving anything away, I can say with 100% confidence, that EX4 is not secure at all and MT4 is weak also. ( I will not say which ones, because there are not many debuggers that can attach an EX4 and I do not want to help the cheats.) Any way, I mapped a EX4 (I created with source code, to compare). My question was just how secure is MT4 and a EX4 file and also, is a decompiler even necessary? I have been thinking about this problem with decompilers and security.
0 kommentar(er)
